Update October 2016
When I wrote this post over 5 years ago, at a time when the fitness tracking market was picking up, I may have passed off for a luddite. Now I feel vindicated. A recent study tracking 470 overweight people over 2 years has demonstrated that fitness trackers are completely inefficient at helping users lose weight.https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/sep/21/fitness-trackers-may-not-aid-weight-loss-study-finds
My advice to you: don't spend hundreds of dollars on a gizmo whose only redeeming value is to make you look cool, use the money for a gym membership instead.My advice: don't spend hundreds of dollars on a gizmo whose only redeeming value is to make you look cool, use the money for a gym membership instead.
As an IT person, I am naturally attracted to the newest high-tech gizmos. So I could not ignore the growing trend in the fitness world consisting in using some kind of electronic monitor to measure one's physical activity and the corresponding number of calories burnt.
GOOD OLE PEDOMETER
The ancestor of all these sophisticated contraptions is the good old pedometer that can still be had today for less than $20. All it monitors is the number of jolts, i.e. steps the wearer takes within a certain period of time. Quite useful indeed for somebody whose sole notable physical activity is walking. But how much better (more effective) are those new activity monitors?
CAN TECH MAKE YOU LOSE WEIGHT?
Most of the modern cousins of the pedometer use several sensors to measure additional parameters like body temperature, heart rate, skin conductivity (level of sweating), speed and distance based on